← Back to PlainDocket
PASSEDHarris County Commissioners Court · 2026-02-12

A second motion was made during the same MAAPnext discussion to extend time until the discussion was finished.

What it means for you

This is a procedural vote that kept the MAAPnext item on the floor; the record does not describe any substantive decision made.

Outcome

Two separate motions were made and votes were taken on Item 75. A motion was made by Commissioner Ellis, seconded by Commissioner Garcia, to extend the time. The motion carried by the following vote:

Official source

Official meeting record — Harris County Legistar ↗

The record does not attribute individual votes for this item — most items pass by named consensus rather than a contested roll call.

Quick answersfrom the official record
Who decides?Decided by a vote of the Harris County Commissioners Court. Taken up at the February 12, 2026 meeting — Adopted.Legistar record ↗
The official caption doesn't name a dollar amount, a beneficiary, or who pays for it — full details in the official Legistar record ↗

Cite this: https://plaindocket.com/item/real-hc26-1091-181538 — data from official records via PlainDocket.