← All vendorsPaid by the cityCARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
The city's published checkbook records $18,200,363 paid to CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION across 643 payment lines, from FY2018 to FY2027.
Name as the city files it — often the legal name, not the trading name. The city's budget year runs July 1 to June 30, so FY2027 means July 2026 through June 2027.
By fiscal year
FY2018$252,894
FY2019$80,161
FY2020$261,035
FY2021$2,651,611
FY2022$2,524,218
FY2023$1,904,908
FY2024$1,944,335
FY2025$2,640,141
FY2026$4,947,040
FY2027$994,020
A dash means no payment to this vendor appears in that year's file. The city publishes this a few times a year, so it runs behind — the newest payments can take a few months to appear, and a fiscal year that has just ended usually isn't published at all yet. Treat the most recent year as incomplete.
Which department paid
$4,776,337
$4,392,519
$3,441,859
$2,908,407
$787,112
$585,907
$341,758
$329,109
$326,921
$202,866
$89,730
$12,879
$4,959
How these purchases were made
PO Contract Release — $13,419,173
PO Emergency — $3,942,332
PO One-time — $545,852
Vendor Invoice — $131,143
PO Interlocal — $81,892
Service Rel. Order — $79,967
These are the purchasing routes the city recorded: 22% was bought under emergency procurement rules. The city publishes the route, not the reason for it.
Contracts billed under
4600018334 — $2,105,857
4600019030 — $1,756,111
4600016539 — $1,185,959
4600017213 — $1,095,875
4600017690 — $971,669
4600019032 — $922,084
4600017525 — $858,177
4600019149 — $710,375
4600018350 — $617,273
4600019278 — $473,138
4600018969 — $442,381
4600018343 — $430,634
The 12 largest of 28 contract numbers this vendor billed under. A contract number is the city's master agreement; individual purchases are released against it and don't each go back to council for a vote.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page is summed from , FY2018–FY2027. PlainDocket stores the totals; the individual payments stay on the city's portal, where you can filter them yourself.
- These are payments, not a budget. The same ledger carries debt payments, bank and pension transfers and accounting reversals alongside what the city bought, so adding it all up doesn't describe city spending — which is why you won't find a citywide total here. What a named vendor or department was paid is solid.
- This covers what the city paid — not what a council vote approved. A contract approved years ago can still be generating payments, and money approved recently may not have been paid yet.