← All vendorsPaid by the cityMOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
The city's published checkbook records $94,965,170 paid to MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC across 977 payment lines, from FY2018 to FY2026.
Name as the city files it — often the legal name, not the trading name. The city's budget year runs July 1 to June 30, so FY2026 means July 2025 through June 2026.
By fiscal year
FY2018$8,451,591
FY2019$2,922,653
FY2020$4,076,093
FY2021$16,087,684
FY2022$8,999,034
FY2023$16,635,791
FY2024$3,935,592
FY2025$14,562,080
FY2026$19,294,652
A dash means no payment to this vendor appears in that year's file. The city publishes this a few times a year, so it runs behind — the newest payments can take a few months to appear, and a fiscal year that has just ended usually isn't published at all yet. Treat the most recent year as incomplete.
Which department paid
$55,874,458
$19,292,003
$10,373,993
$5,805,997
$3,387,830
$138,614
$69,112
$23,163
How these purchases were made
PO Contract Release — $42,133,466
PO Cap Proj Release — $25,327,406
Service Rel. Order — $18,938,411
PO Emergency — $7,205,926
PO Interlocal — $794,466
PO One-time — $564,736
Vendor Invoice — $761
These are the purchasing routes the city recorded: 8% was bought under emergency procurement rules. The city publishes the route, not the reason for it.
Contracts billed under
4600017539 — $27,194,644
4600015776 — $18,037,461
4600009232 — $11,116,999
4600017507 — $8,224,473
4600016290 — $7,705,169
4600018633 — $3,073,000
4600017520 — $2,732,969
4600016949 — $1,847,440
4600018334 — $1,733,974
4600017213 — $1,457,956
4600019030 — $929,893
4600016539 — $611,530
The 12 largest of 17 contract numbers this vendor billed under. A contract number is the city's master agreement; individual purchases are released against it and don't each go back to council for a vote.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page is summed from , FY2018–FY2026. PlainDocket stores the totals; the individual payments stay on the city's portal, where you can filter them yourself.
- These are payments, not a budget. The same ledger carries debt payments, bank and pension transfers and accounting reversals alongside what the city bought, so adding it all up doesn't describe city spending — which is why you won't find a citywide total here. What a named vendor or department was paid is solid.
- This covers what the city paid — not what a council vote approved. A contract approved years ago can still be generating payments, and money approved recently may not have been paid yet.