← All vendorsPaid by the cityTIMES CONSTRUCTION INC
The city's published checkbook records $45,157,119 paid to TIMES CONSTRUCTION INC across 1,334 payment lines, from FY2018 to FY2027.
Name as the city files it — often the legal name, not the trading name. The city's budget year runs July 1 to June 30, so FY2027 means July 2026 through June 2027.
By fiscal year
FY2018$3,736,721
FY2019$5,548,531
FY2020$9,517,464
FY2021$5,533,853
FY2022$3,054,153
FY2023$3,321,300
FY2024$6,958,999
FY2025$3,755,364
FY2026$2,631,698
FY2027$1,099,036
A dash means no payment to this vendor appears in that year's file. The city publishes this a few times a year, so it runs behind — the newest payments can take a few months to appear, and a fiscal year that has just ended usually isn't published at all yet. Treat the most recent year as incomplete.
Which department paid
$13,334,818
$8,862,801
$8,181,566
$4,687,263
$3,708,276
$3,694,248
$2,378,010
$1,260,575
$203,700
$139,648
$49,962
-$1,343,748
How these purchases were made
PO Cap Proj Release — $67,815,617
Service Rel. Order — $8,752,132
PO Emergency — $963,894
PO Contract Release — $734,515
PO One-time — $68,215
Vendor Invoice — -$33,177,251
These are the purchasing routes the city recorded: 1% was bought under emergency procurement rules. The city publishes the route, not the reason for it.
Contracts billed under
4600015208 — $14,494,584
4600013939 — $8,951,095
4600014887 — $8,929,075
4600016096 — $6,923,924
4600014363 — $6,378,401
4600017594 — $4,836,234
4600018021 — $4,674,720
4600015919 — $4,384,546
4600015873 — $4,202,654
4600014674 — $3,121,748
4600014991 — $2,460,189
4600017801 — $2,152,258
The 12 largest of 23 contract numbers this vendor billed under. A contract number is the city's master agreement; individual purchases are released against it and don't each go back to council for a vote.
Where this comes from
Every figure on this page is summed from , FY2018–FY2027. PlainDocket stores the totals; the individual payments stay on the city's portal, where you can filter them yourself.
- These are payments, not a budget. The same ledger carries debt payments, bank and pension transfers and accounting reversals alongside what the city bought, so adding it all up doesn't describe city spending — which is why you won't find a citywide total here. What a named vendor or department was paid is solid.
- This covers what the city paid — not what a council vote approved. A contract approved years ago can still be generating payments, and money approved recently may not have been paid yet.